Most will tell you that the creation evolution debate is over and evolution has been proven. However I have encountered considerable evidence that raises doubts. Most don't know that radio isotope dating has failed several single blind tests. If it was a pharmaceutical it would be banned.
There are places where 'old' fossils are found under 'younger' fossils. Where there are big gaps. Samples of new lava from modern volcanoes have been sent to labs for testing with documentation from supposedly old deposits. The labs cant tell the difference between new lava and 'old' samples. The dates relate more to how the measurements are made and the assumptions involved. The machines and measurements are calibrated using those assumptions yet they are drawn from required 'hints' in the sample submission paper work. Thus the results is more to do with beliefs than any isotopic patterns in the rock.
A simpler explanation is that the fossils are produced by a truly catastrophic flood that destroyed ecosystems in a sequence from sea bed through to the mountain landscapes creating a neat sequence from simple slow organisms through low land cold blooded animals and up to highland mammalian fauna.
All fossils date from the flood and almost all geology dates from this event. The exception is the ice age fauna which died at the end of the ice age due to climate change, about 300 years after the flood and the volcanic islands of Indonesia, the pacific and New Zealand, etc, that date from about the same post flood time period.